Unlike some other travel writers and air travel commentators, I’m still a big fan of airline alliances. Those are the large, multi-airline, varying degrees of cooperation, groupings of airlines, promising “seamless travel”, “earn and redeem across our network”, “global recognition”, and other buzzwordy come-ons that often fall short. But not always. Of the three big alliances, oneworld, Skyteam, and Star Alliance, the latter, Star, is my favorite. Not only nor even primarily because it is the biggest, not because it’s the oldest, but because it is by far the most integrated. They come closer to delivering more of those cloudy benefits than do the other two, in my experience as a traveler and in what I read as an analyst of the travel scene. They are definitely doing so with this move.
Star’s “Move Under One Roof” initiative – something they all talk about, but *A (as it’s often abbreviated on sites such as Flyertalk) is doing so much more with it. This initiative in London, at London’s premier international airport, Heathrow, really outdoes everybody. Read the story from Future Travel Experience, watch the video in that link, and then read on here. Continue reading
As many of you know, I now live in Uruguay, in a beach town about an hour from its capital, Montevideo. One of the issues in being an immigrant to a new country, or being an expat from somewhere else, if that’s how you consider yourself, is the cost of getting back “home”. Even if you don’t consider your country of origin your actual home anymore, you likely have family, friends, and other reasons to visit it. For many Uruguay expats, the USA is their home. Fares to and from the US to anywhere in the Southern Cone of South America are often awful. Uruguay one of the worst for finding deals, due in part to losing our national airline Pluna and limited options with other airlines. Darn rare to find under $1000 USD for a round-trip (“return” in non-USA English) flight. Often much more.
How does $627 sound? Continue reading
Whether you supported this merger, were neutral, were ambivalent, or hated the idea, it’s now a done deal. One company. Let’s hope it succeeds, because there are real men and women working at it, and at its vendors, suppliers, agents, affiliates, whose income and households depend on their employment. There are shareholders of the new American Airlines stock, including retirement funds, and of both airlines’ debt instruments, again including retirement funds. So whether it’s bigger than you wanted, whether you love’em or hate’em, there are real people’s lives at play here. Both AA and US (the airlines of the new company) have made a lot of improvements recently, so I’m hopeful for them. I also have some friends who work for them, and that’s my “skin in the game” right there – I want my friends to continue to have jobs!
Now some important questions, and what’s known of the answers, and advice. I’m going to skip most of the common stuff, because you’re better off clicking the picture above, which will take you to the American Airlines website aa.com’s special merger info page, www.aa.com/arriving. Or to the USAirways.com version of the merger info page.
That’s your first lesson, right there. US Airways and American Airlines are still two entirely separate airlines. They have two entirely separate websites. Right now, they have absolutely nothing in common, except that as of early this morning, Dec. 9, 2013, they are now both owned by the same company. You buy US Airways tickets at usairways.com. You buy American Airlines tickets at aa.com. You check in, whether online or at the airport, at the appropriate American or US Airways location. Nobody from American Airlines (the airline itself) can yet help you with anything to do with a US Airways flight, ticket, reservation, frequent flyer account, payment issue, nor anything else. Nobody from US Airways can yet help you with anything to do with American. It will be that way for months. On some issues, possibly for a few years.
In other words, as a traveler about to head out on a business trip, or for holiday season vacations and family visits, absolutely nothing has changed. Continue reading
Not sure I like this. In fact, as a relatively experienced air traveler, pretty sure I don’t.
Need some background on the approval today? Try this NBC News story on the Justice Department coming to terms with American and US Airways.
I’m torn in a few directions on it. Continue reading
I’ve been writing a lot about airline alliances lately. Not always with the most accurate predictions (but just wait…) As a fairly frequent traveler over the years, whether for work, family, or now as an expat, I need to maximize my miles. So knowing (and speculating on) who is partnering with whom, who else I can earn miles and status benefits with, and thus what grouping I should plan my future travel on, is important. Also I find it fun. Yeah, I know.
Couple of weeks old, but I don’t hang out much in the Finnair forum on FlyerTalk all that much. Nor for the most part with oneworld alliance airlines. I’ve burned off the last of my American AAdvantage miles with my upcoming LAN flight home to Uruguay in August. I do have earnings in LANPass, but my recent paid LAN flights were credited to unaligned Alaska Airlines Mileage Plan, rather than to LAN’s own program within oneworld.
But I have noticed that the oneworld alliance has been getting weaker and shakier, at least in comparison to the booming Star Alliance and the now no-longer-leftover SkyTeam. Finnair’s move, as reported in this thread at FlyerTalk, looks to be weakening one of the core European players in that alliance.
In the past few years, other European airlines have either left that alliance, scaled back service significantly to just intra-European and near-Europe routes, or gone out of business entirely. Hungary’s Malev is no more as of early this year, and they discontinued their Budapest-USA service a couple of years before that. I flew them just intra-Europe a few years back, when they were a Northwest Airlines partner despite being in competing alliances. Ok, nothing special, pride-of-a-small-proud-country airline. (Like pathetic little Pluna of Uruguay, which exists despite the country not being big enough to justify its own airline.) But another hub, another network in the alliance gone. Aer Lingus used to be a oneworld member. It switched to so-called low-cost, mostly Europe-centric and lessened TATL, with subsidized weird deals, even doing a wet-lease Washington-Madrid flight flying as United Airlines. Aligning on other routes with FF benefits and codeshares with United, arch-enemy of oneworld co-founder American.
Elsewhere, oneworld is further weakening. American Airlines is a mess, with a bankruptcy reorganization crippled by employee unions making deals with a competitor to take them over. Even though that competitor itself still hasn’t completed its 8-year-old merger and has warring unions. The only other North American oneworld carrier, Mexicana, went into bankruptcy and was grounded about two years ago. There is no Central American carrier, while Star Alliance just gained two (or three, or four, or even five, depending on if you count Avianca and Taca separately, and Copa and Copa Colombia, and LACSA as different from Taca.)
There’s been no Canada representation since the early 2000’s takeover of Canadian Airlines by Star Alliance co-founder Air Canada. The only north-south lift in Western North America of substance is provided by non-alliance partner Alaska Airlines, who also partners with arch-competitor SkyTeam founder Delta (and in Europe, with founder AirFrance-KLM.) In South Asia, oneworld was supposed to gain Kingfisher of India by now. But while the Kingfisher Beer brewery is doing great, the airline is bouncing checks and repeatedly being grounded, likely soon for good.
Yes, oneworld has gained some airlines in that same timeframe. Royal Jordanian a few years ago. Most recently airberlin, which though tiny compared to Lufthansa, does serve well as a northern and central European hub carrier. But with Malev gone, Finnair weakening (and don’t ignore Finnish flagship company Nokia’s failings as part of what will drive down international travel to Finland), oneworld’s European position is weak. Yes, IAG is a giant international conglomerate that now owns British Airways, Iberia, and now former Star member British Midland BMI (being folded into BA). But look at the geography: Both England and Spain are on the periphery of Europe, not its core. Berlin is core, but airberlin can’t fully compete against Star founder Lufthansa‘s giant built-over-decades Frankfurt and Munich hubs. Nor its wholly-owned or affiliated partners Austrian (Vienna hub), SWISS (Geneva and Zurich hubs), and LOT Polish (Warsaw hub)
I’m no insider. But it doesn’t look good for oneworld from where I sit on the plane. And it thus makes me less likely to book on any oneworld carrier until this all shakes out. Unless it is a carrier such as American or LAN which is a full partner including Elite earnings and benefits with non-oneworld Alaska Airlines Mileage Plan.